The right to strike is a right guaranteed by the Constitution and the law protects the employee striker who cannot be the subject of any sanction to have taken part in a strike.
But all the collective movements are not strikes. So that the employee profits from legal protection, the movement in which it took part must answer the definition of the strike. Moreover certain types of “strike” are illicit.
- Which is the definition of the right to strike?
- Which claims are legitimate or not?
If the movement concerned receives the qualifier of strike, all the rules applicable to the aforementioned are implemented, in particular concerning the protection of the strikers, the deexpertbase.netctions to wages….
However, while being a strike, the movement can be abusive: certain behaviors are not allowed to in no case.
- Which are the financial consequences of the strike?
- Which is the exact extent of the protection from which the striker profits?
- Which acts are likely to make the strike abusive?
Moreover, the employer is not deprived of all means of action vis-a-vis a strike. He can act:
- Can the employer make close the firm expertbase.netring the strike?
- Can the employer sanction the strikers? In which cases?
- Can the employer replace the strikers?
In the private sector, the right to strike is very wide, but it is not the case in the public area. If the right to strike is recognized to the officials, it is more restrictive and the agents have less freedom.
- Which are the rules to be adhered to for the officials before being able to strike?
- Do all the officials have the right to put themselves in strike?