Who Are the 99'ers? Well, That Depends on Who You Ask These days!

Not long ago, an "acquaintance" of mine, and I useWWII. I am all in when it comes to the 99'ers,
that term in most loosely fashion, as in about asthat is to say the actual 99'ers group of women
much an acquaintance as half of the so-calledaviators. But I cannot support more money for
friends on your Facebook Page - explained thatextending unemployment benefits to the
something must be done to save the 99'ers, and99-weekers any longer.
I am thinking; "hey the 99'ers are doing fine," butBy allowing politicians to banter around the term
then he explained which 99'ers he was talking99'ers in the media is actually hurting the
about. You see, he meant those individuals whobrand-names of both those organizations with
had been out on unemployment for 99-weekscauses that are not within the scope of their
and would soon lose their unemployment benefits.endeavors. Let's call these unemployed folks the
Indeed, I was puzzled because, 100-weeks is24'monthers instead, that's two-years my friend,
almost 2-years, and we as tax-payers cannot paylet's put this into perspective. Look, no offense to
people to "not work" forever. And while theyanyone who is unemployed, but I am not for
were collecting these benefits we should haveextending unemployment benefits, because it
been requiring community volunteer work; coachgoes against that; "teach a man to fish, don't give
a youth soccer team, help the elderly, or doa man a fish" principle.
some non-profit work hours each week as partTo me it's common sense. I do not want my tax
of the deal. So, when my acquaintance said wedollar supporting a program that will only make
must do something, he meant extend benefitspeople dependent on the state. That goes against
for these 99'ers and he asked if we had talkedevolution, human decency, and fundamental tried
about this in our think tank?and true principles of human motivation. You see,
Yes, we have addressed the unemploymentI am not a liberal-socialist. I am a freedom loving,
issues, but I told him; "I completely disagree withfree-market man, who believes in liberty and the
your websites' focus and ascertains. I disagreeindividual.
with any further extensions for unemploymentLook we have unemployment growing because of
benefits." Why you ask? Well, because the public,bad government policy, and shelling out more
unions, employees voted for our currentmoney is going to drive us into a no-win
leadership and their economic policies and theyVenezuela, Argentina-like economic catastrophe. In
must live with their decisions, learn their lessons.fact, why don't we just send
Indeed, I do not wish to pay more taxes for"grow-marijuana-at-home" free kits to all
unemployment benefits, especially to people whounemployed people and take the money we were
trash entrepreneurship, free-enterprise, capitalism,going to give them and send 60% of it to the
small businesses - be careful what you wish forChinese, 25% to the Middle East, and save the
my friend, that's what I told my acquaintance.15% to pay down the debt on the Obama
Further on a more critical point; there is a groupStimulus? This would have the same effect.
called the 99'ers which is a Foundation for theHere is the deal, if we really want unemployment
families of fallen highway patrolmen also. It's calledto come down, we could merely give $12,000 per
the "11-99 Foundation" but the nickname is 99'ers.person that a small businessman hires with the
There is also a group of Women in Aviation, withrestrictions that the individuals must be employed
an HQ and museum in OKC called the 99'ers, I'vethere for 6-months. Piece of cake, and it sure
been there. It is an organization that I fullybeats those $1.2 million dollars per shovel ready
support and have also visited their museum. I alsojobs they got out of their last stupid economic
have close family friends who fully supportsaving promise. Please consider all this.
women aviators, and two who were WASPS in