The Significant Features of a 'Discourse Community'

The term discourse means a conversation orworld there are two situations for a discourse
more extended and more formal discussion ofcommunity, between co-workers and between
our ideas in either speech or writing. A discoursethe professionals and the clients. The professional
community is a group of people who can speakhas to relay to the client the information that the
the same language, share an interest in certainclient requires, in some cases this may require the
topics and goals, know and understand a greatprofessional to explain technical terms to the
deal about them, and possess a common orclient, or in some cases the professional may try
technical vocabulary for discussing the same.to awe the client with his use of technical
Particular individuals will not fall into a singlelanguage or jargon. Telesales are an example of
discourse community. For example, a lawyerprofessional - client interaction in that a specific
usually specialises in a certain field of work, suchpattern is adhered to from the beginning of the
as conveyancing, but he is also a member of theprocess so that the professional can maintain as
larger legal service in which a common legalmuch control of the conversation as possible. The
technical vocabulary, common interests and goalsclient answers the telephone call, the caller then
are present. This is what makes discourseaddresses the client by his assumed title. Once
communities so difficult to isolate into singlethe identity of the client is confirmed the
communities.professional will begin their 'sales pitch' where they
Discourse communities do not only occur in theinform the prospective client of what they are
workplace, but also play a key role in social life.selling in a rehearsed and well planned manner, it is
For example, the language used when talking tothen up to the client to decide whether he wants
ones mother will be different from when talkingto hear more, accept or decline the offer. In this
to a close friend. It will again be different whensituation the balance of power swings from the
writing to a prospective employer. Indeed writtenseller to the client in that the seller weans
discourse and spoken discourse are likely to beinformation from the client but ultimately the client
highly different as written English is usually of ahas the right to cancel the entire process at any
highly rigid standardised form and spoken Englishtime the client see fit [Ref 6 p103]. This discourse
to be highly un-standard with varieties of Englishis one of client and professional where the power
arising from such things as culture, location andis vested in the client but in some other scenarios
age; both of which being different communities ofthe weight of the power is more heavily vested
discourse.in one or other of the parties.
Discourse communities used in any setting provideThis is the case in areas such as medicine where
a social link between the persons talking. In thesethe roles of the client and professional are
discourses however there are rules that all partiesdifferent. It has been observed by researchers
must abide by. They must begin, continue andsuch as Maynard that unlike the process of
then finish a conversation. At the beginning of apatient asking for a prognosis and the doctor
conversation there can be something known assupplying it that a three turn system is more
phatic communion [Ref 1 p7] where so calledlikely to appear, this is a query from the doctor
'small talk' brings the talkers together and set thefollowed by the patient's reply and assessment
parameters for the conversation, during thefollowed by the doctors report and diagnosis [Ref
conversation there will be factors such as social7 p105]. This system shows how the balance of
status and age to determine the topics and as topower in a conversation cab be affected in a
what direction it follows. Obviously the final part ofwork to client relationship depending upon the
a conversation is the closing and ending of thesituation presented and the profession which is
same. This is generally done through repetition ofbeing employed.
polite closing comments made to one another andWork colleagues may speak to each other in a
occasionally references to what has been said incompletely different way to that which they
the conversation to bring together and close thespeak to their clients, it may be that co-workers
social event that a conversation is. Pleasantriesof a certain level in a work hierarchy speak
are exchanged to show that the ending of thedifferently to their bosses and their own
conversation and separating of ways is not duesubordinates. Gender in the workplace has been
to being affronted and in doing this people arestudied in depth to ascertain what influence it has
constantly using 'face work'.over the speech patterns of employees, the
Throughout a conversation the socialist Ervingfindings of Woods shows that gender is still the
Goffman suggests the process of 'face work' ismost influential factor on the apportionment of
occurring. This is where all parties attempt tofloor apportionment (floor apportionment being
reduce or avoid any loss of face, and if any losssubstantial speaking time). Even when a
of face does occur it is remedied via an apologyhigher-ranking female was speaking lower ranking
or a change of wording [Ref 2 p8]. Thesemale counterparts would interrupt more
considerations are used to try and retain socialfrequently and break the line of conversation in
standing and are an attempt to be acceptedorder to increase their own floor apportionment
within the social and personal environment.[Ref 8 p95]. This influence of gender even in the
When people talk to one another they speak inworkplace shows how important it is in the
dialog. Whereby from what speakers haveformation of male-female interaction within
previously said or through shared or implieddiscourse communities.
experience the talkers can anticipate what theCo-workers in set workplaces will begin over a
other is going to say [Ref 3 p6], in a discourseperiod of time to evolve their own phrases and
community this is essential as without this sharedterminology for the work and processes that
experience the discourse community could notthey perform, often these terms will mean little
exist, it is also useful in that the speakers canto the lay man but within these set groups they
anticipate what one another is going to say, anwill have specialised and certain meanings. In male
imperative feature in a technical environmentorientated environments it has been noted that
where shared knowledge is highly important.there is an increase of swearing and this fact has
An interesting discourse community to study isbeen linked to a show of manhood and/or
that between men and women. Research hasmasculinity, this overt use of swearing is another
shown that in mixed company women usuallysign of a discourse community, one in which the
have a smaller role in the conversation than theirmembers show off their social position by using
male counterparts. Lakoff observed that womenphrases and words which they know will promote
tend to use more tag questions, intensifiers andtheir masculinity [Ref 9 p88].
the more indirect polite form [Ref 4 p19]. This isDiscourse communities are a way in which people
unlike men who take the lead in conversationsrelate to one another in a social environment. In
with women and direct the flow of the talking.that they all share a similarity. The way in which
Goodwin has suggested a reason for this in thatthese communities operate will vary not only with
male and female children play differently. Boysthe contributors but also in the environment in
tend to play within hierarchical systems whereaswhich it is set. The use of continual foul language
girls work in cooperative groups this being awould not be permitted in some social settings
tendency that seems to follow into later life.yet in some workplaces it is a common
Arguments within the boys' hierarchy were sortedoccurrence. All discourse communities will have
out immediately with the child attempting tosome specialised or unique form of vocabulary
change the hierarchy brought to account as soonand syntax marking it out from any other, and in
as the event occurred; whereas the girls tendedthat the individuals will have to learn to use and
to discuss the situation in the absence of theadapt their language skills as they move from one
accused party and then formulate a conclusion.discourse community to another as they
These outcomes may well show why theencounter different people and settings every day
attitudes of men and women in conversationof their lives.
differ so greatly, in that as children the boys learnAll references are from Janet Maybin and Neil
to be more direct and confrontational and the girlsMercer (2002 5th Edition) Using English from
discuss cooperatively and less directly [Ref 5 p19].conversation to canon, London. Routledge. For
The work environment is one in which discoursemore information on this topic, see
communities most readily arises. In the businesseasyessaywriting.co.