New Age Democracy

No one in their right mind wants government bycan prevent morphing into the previous or latest
mass mind. No one wants majority rule and iftyranny. Everything is OK with some folks, some
someone does, they have no idea how it mightthings are OK with most folks and nothing is OK
work. There is no doubt in my mind there arewith few folks. The last group likely has the most
minds in America today, far superior to thoseto offer the other two but they have no
who privately crafted governments, state andfranchise and little public expression. Their votes
national, centuries ago, when wisdom wascount the least, if they bother at all. In a
respected and fashionable. There are few if anydemocracy of ignorance, ignorance rules and
political parties that believe the old U.S. Constitutionignorance is easily manipulated by those with
is not in need of upgrade to suit the times. Whilegreat agendas, often no less ignorant than those
the original was drafted by elitist, self righteousthey claim to represent. If there has been a
property and slave owners, the replacement couldnoticeable dumbing down of modern politicians, we
easily be crafted by high school and collegecan point to an educational system that holds law
students, professional think tanks, concernedto be a specialty. Even those who choose the
citizens, non citizen residents, political parties andspecialty are cheated of a basic education in the
political candidates. We just need a few rulehistorical development, principles and fundamentals
changes to make this happen.of law. Hence, they graduate to practice
Rule number one:corporate law they neither know nor understand.
No political candidate may run for any state officeThose who go on to write law are also simply
until that candidate has submitted a proposal forpracticing, at every one else's expense.
changes in the state constitution and made itA U.S. Congressman proclaimed during last year's
public.presidential campaign that no one in Congress
Rule number two:reads all the bills they vote on. They depend upon
No political party shall have ballot status until it hasaides and assistants to summarize the bills and
submitted a proposal for changes in the statethey vote on the summary. We are told that if
constitution and made it public. Party platformsCongressmen had to read the laws they vote on,
can be next to useless but a proposal fornothing would get done. Maybe it is time to stop
changes in the laws that govern us all, tells agetting things done and examine the whole political
resident, citizen, or voter far more than campaignsystem.
platforms, themes, pledges and promises. AllRule number 6:no bill in any legislative body may
people would have the opportunity to know whatbe voted on unless it has been published for 30
was at stake in any election.days and the pros and cons from all responders
Rule number 3:are tallied. This would allow the public to see when
No candidate for national office may have ballotthey are being overruled by those claiming to
status without submitting a revision of the nationalrepresent them. The idea that we could get along
constitution and making it public.without a given law for ten years or a hundred
Rule number 4:and then need to rush a vote in the next few
No political party may attain ballot status in adays or hours, is absurd on its face.
national election until it has offered revisions toMost Americans now understand that laws are
the national constitution and made it public.not written by their representatives in law making
Rule number five:bodies. Laws are written by special interests who
No person shall vote in any election in which thathire lobbyists to submit and promote laws
person has not demonstrated a knowledge of thefavoring the writers. Representatives then debate
ballot qualified parties.and vote upon these laws. If they were voting
We have a policy in our universal education ofonly after 30 days of public feedback, special
testing proficiencies in key subjects, such asinterests would not have but a fraction of the
English, mathematics and science. Yet the socialpower they now enjoy.
contract, the laws we choose to live by togetherRule number 7:
are handed to us by corporate professionalNo legislator shall post any bill for public
specialists, crafting social behavior by incessantexamination, without disclosing the source of the
law making. Shouldn't laws be made by the peoplebill and a list of expected beneficiaries. The fact is
who must live by them and bear the costs?that most of our social contract is null and void,
Should those who know nothing of law and socialdue to fraudulent, treasonous government. Those
contract be making those laws and that contractmost affected by current and future law, have
we are forced to live by in our daily lives?had no say in it. How can this be considered
By the way, shouldn't the people who are payingdemocratic in any way? How long should we
for the spread of democracy get a look at thepretend it is? This is the Information Age, not the
proposals for the new constitutions ofPlantation Age. Perhaps it is time for the Law of
Afghanistan and Iraq? It's mostly math that tellsthe Land to reflect this minor change. What role
us the cost of a war in blood and money. Byshould ignorance play in the American future? Can
what measure do we determine the value of thewe move to a qualified republican democracy
democracy effort?from a cruel joke? Where there is no will, there is
Disenfranchising the ignorant sounds undemocratic,no way.
yet it is the only way a democratic government