| e_content"> | | | | theories. On this issue, Friedman held the opinion |
| INTRODUCTION: | | | | that economists should only invoke the predictive |
| Milton Friedman was an American economist as | | | | ability of the theory and not the descriptive |
| well as being a public intellectual. He was born in | | | | realism of the theory. Friedman was also influential |
| 1912 and died at the age of 94 in 2006. He was | | | | in proposing that governments use countercyclical |
| an ardent advocate of economic freedom as well | | | | budget policies. |
| as personal liberty. Before his death Friedman was | | | | CASE ANALYSIS: JAPANS MACROECONOMIC |
| one of the most influential scholars and figures of | | | | POLICIES: |
| authority in the fields of microeconomics, | | | | Japan is the world’s second largest |
| statistics, and economic history as well as the field | | | | economy from the United States. It is a market |
| of macroeconomics, which happens to be the field | | | | economy just like the United States although |
| of study. | | | | geographically it is very small. Japan is an industrial |
| THESIS STATEMENT: | | | | state although it relies mainly on imported raw |
| Milton Friedman, although unfortunately bereaved, | | | | materials for its industries. As thus, Japan is highly |
| was one of the most influential economics of all | | | | dependent on the nature of international trade and |
| time. Many economists as well as economies big | | | | this means that Freidman’s analysis of |
| and small have adapted to the teachings of | | | | price theories, inflation and free trade has a huge |
| Friedman. Why has this been so? In trying to | | | | impact within the Japanese macroeconomic |
| analyze this paper, I will look at some of the | | | | policies. |
| major contributions of Friedman to the field of | | | | Within Japan, the economy has followed the |
| macroeconomics. | | | | teachings of Friedman in the following ways. |
| ANALYSIS: | | | | Firstly, the country has realized the importance of |
| Macroeconomics is a sub-discipline in the field of | | | | laissez faire economics. For this reason, given that |
| economics. It concerns it self with the structure, | | | | the country relies mostly on imported raw |
| performance and the behaviors of national | | | | materials for its industries have, been one of the |
| economies. It seeks to find out the determinants | | | | major advocate’s free trade. This has |
| of the aggregate movements within the | | | | been commissioned in many ways including being |
| economy. | | | | one of the influential members of the world trade |
| Macroeconomics gives specific attention to | | | | organization. |
| inflation, unemployment, international trade, | | | | Secondly, the country has adopted |
| investments and the national income. | | | | Friedman’s teachings in the way the |
| On the other hand, Microeconomics is the branch | | | | country designs its fiscal policy; this has been |
| of economics that concerns itself with the | | | | done mainly by changing the composition of public |
| processes that firm's, households and individuals | | | | spending instead of expanding it. |
| concerns themselves in allocating limited resources. | | | | Thirdly, the countries central bank, the bank of |
| In this sense microeconomics scrutinizes how | | | | Japan has also followed Friedman’s rules in |
| these decisions affect the demand and supply | | | | inflation targeting and interest rate benchmarking. |
| schedules and helps determine not only the prices | | | | In addition to these, the Japanese cabinet |
| but also how these prices influence the supply and | | | | especially in recent years has been very vocal in |
| demand of goods and services in any given | | | | trying to push for structural reforms as well as |
| market segment. | | | | the adoption of stringent business policies |
| Macroeconomics is generally divided in to two | | | | especially in the financial sector that has been |
| major areas of study; the business cycle which | | | | affected by banking crisis for a very long time. |
| concerns itself mainly with the consequences and | | | | Concerning the activities of the bank of Japan, it |
| causes of the of short term fluctuations in | | | | is important to note that for a long time now the |
| national income and the determinants of the long | | | | bank has been steadily increasing the money |
| run economic growth (increases in the national | | | | supply. This is intended to contain inflation as well |
| income). | | | | as being a way of supporting the fiscal policy. In |
| As thus, the field of macroeconomics is of | | | | addition to this, the Japanese economy has been |
| paramount importance in designing, developing and | | | | under a condition of a liquidity trap. |
| evaluating strategies and policies not only for | | | | According to the monetarist theory, mainly |
| governments but also for large corporations like | | | | influenced by Milton Friedman, a country would |
| Sony and Toyota. | | | | most likely move out of a liquidity trap by turning |
| Macroeconomics concerns itself with economic | | | | to the printing press or increasing the money |
| aggregates of the nation’s economic | | | | supply. In order for Japan to move out of the |
| activities. On this field, macroeconomics concerns | | | | liquidity trap, the bank of Japan has resulted to |
| itself with issues of government actions (spending | | | | the printing press as well as the purchase of |
| and taxation), issues of unemployment, inflation as | | | | Japanese government’s treasury bonds. |
| well as general economic policies. | | | | These are all monetarist activities and they go on |
| CONCERNING FRIEDMAN: | | | | to show us how the Japanese economy has gone |
| Friedman for a long time worked in isolation. Until | | | | in line with the teachings of Milton Friedman. |
| the late 70s, many scholars especially in the field | | | | CRITICISMS: |
| of economics met Friedman’s work with a | | | | Although Friedman was very influential on the field |
| lot of hostility. | | | | of macroeconomics, very many different schools |
| Milton Friedman was an ardent opponent to the | | | | of thought have criticized, or have held different |
| Keynesian economics; Milton led the "Monetarist | | | | views from those of Friedman. These include the |
| school" commonly referred to the Chicago School | | | | Marxists, the Keynesians and neo-Keynesians. |
| against the Keynesian school of economics. | | | | The Keynesians and neo-Keynesians advocate for |
| Friedman's contributions include the "Permanent | | | | a mixed economy. In this view, they consider an |
| Income Hypothesis" on consumption (1957), in | | | | equally important role to be played by both the |
| addition to this there was the formulation of | | | | private sector and the government. . Thus |
| risk-aversion and risk-proclivity (1948); he was | | | | Keynes believed that the government was |
| also influential through his evolutionary theory on | | | | responsible for not only helping the economy rise |
| the theory of the firm, including his own | | | | out of a depression by increasing aggregate |
| propositions for a "positivist" methodology in | | | | spending but also it could increase general levels of |
| economics (1953). | | | | investments by pumping more money into the |
| Friedman was key influential in macroeconomics | | | | economy, then the citizens are encouraged to |
| especially in attacking the Keynesians on their | | | | spend more because more money is in circulation. |
| view of the IS-LM analysis. In this attack, | | | | Once this is done then People will start to invest |
| Friedman wanted the Keynesians not to ignore | | | | more, and the economy will react by increasing |
| money matters in their analysis. | | | | productive ventures. |
| He was critical in pinpointing the importance of a | | | | Thus, Keynes argued that government |
| laissez-faire economy, but he still held the | | | | investment in public goods that will not be |
| proposition that concrete policies need to be | | | | provided for by the market would encourage the |
| operational within the economy for there to be | | | | private sector's growth. This would include |
| harmony in the economy. | | | | government spending on such things as basic |
| In essence, the works and teachings of Friedman | | | | research, public health, education, and |
| came to be an influential part of modern | | | | infrastructure. |
| economics especially after the Keynesian analysis | | | | On the other side, the Marxists beliefs in a social |
| failed to offer a solution to the 1970s crisis | | | | state where neither the government nor the |
| because of the prevalent cost-push inflation and | | | | market takes control. Karl Marx believed that the |
| the inability of Keynesians to offer a solution to | | | | state was a manifestation of the ruling class, in |
| the increasing wages and prices. | | | | many instances he claimed, that the ruling class |
| Friedman scathingly attacked the Keynesians for | | | | was the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of |
| failing to debate or offer directions on the need | | | | production). Whose aim was self-enrichment under |
| for competitive markets, this Friedman said was | | | | such a state developments of either the |
| the reason why there had emerged larger | | | | infrastructure or education would be done if it |
| monopolies within the 50s and the 60s which led | | | | were to their benefit and not to the benefit of |
| to the ensuing stagflation. | | | | the workers (Proletariat). |
| In addition to this, Friedman together with other | | | | CONCLUSION: |
| scholars from the Chicago school provided | | | | The works of Milton Friedman will continue to hold |
| evidence to prove that within competitive | | | | the field of economics for a long time to come, |
| markets the price system could effectively and | | | | especially in these days of globalization and |
| efficiently to allocate scarce resources. In his own | | | | increasing interdependence of states. |
| words, Friedman claimed that the price system | | | | REFERENCES: |
| plays the following roles: firstly, the price system | | | | Hadjimichalakis M. (1982) Modern Economics, |
| provides incentives for the adoption of the least | | | | Prentice Hall Publishers, New Jersey |
| costly methods of production. The price system | | | | H. Stratton (1999) Economics: A New Introduction, |
| also helps in using available resources for the best | | | | Pluto Press, USA |
| use available, in addition the price system is used | | | | Martin U. (1976) Agricultural Production Economics |
| to transmit information on production, available | | | | and Resources Used, Oxford University Press, |
| resources and tastes, on top of this the prices | | | | Oxford |
| can be used to determine the distribution system | | | | Paul Anthony Samuelson (1964) Economics, |
| who gets what when and how. | | | | McGraw-Hill publishers, USA |
| Friedman was also influential in designing test | | | | Thomas A. |