Milton Friedman

e_content">theories. On this issue, Friedman held the opinion
INTRODUCTION:that economists should only invoke the predictive
Milton Friedman was an American economist asability of the theory and not the descriptive
well as being a public intellectual. He was born inrealism of the theory. Friedman was also influential
1912 and died at the age of 94 in 2006. He wasin proposing that governments use countercyclical
an ardent advocate of economic freedom as wellbudget policies.
as personal liberty. Before his death Friedman wasCASE ANALYSIS: JAPANS MACROECONOMIC
one of the most influential scholars and figures ofPOLICIES:
authority in the fields of microeconomics,Japan is the world’s second largest
statistics, and economic history as well as the fieldeconomy from the United States. It is a market
of macroeconomics, which happens to be the fieldeconomy just like the United States although
of study.geographically it is very small. Japan is an industrial
THESIS STATEMENT:state although it relies mainly on imported raw
Milton Friedman, although unfortunately bereaved,materials for its industries. As thus, Japan is highly
was one of the most influential economics of alldependent on the nature of international trade and
time. Many economists as well as economies bigthis means that Freidman’s analysis of
and small have adapted to the teachings ofprice theories, inflation and free trade has a huge
Friedman. Why has this been so? In trying toimpact within the Japanese macroeconomic
analyze this paper, I will look at some of thepolicies.
major contributions of Friedman to the field ofWithin Japan, the economy has followed the
macroeconomics.teachings of Friedman in the following ways.
ANALYSIS:Firstly, the country has realized the importance of
Macroeconomics is a sub-discipline in the field oflaissez faire economics. For this reason, given that
economics. It concerns it self with the structure,the country relies mostly on imported raw
performance and the behaviors of nationalmaterials for its industries have, been one of the
economies. It seeks to find out the determinantsmajor advocate’s free trade. This has
of the aggregate movements within thebeen commissioned in many ways including being
economy.one of the influential members of the world trade
Macroeconomics gives specific attention toorganization.
inflation, unemployment, international trade,Secondly, the country has adopted
investments and the national income.Friedman’s teachings in the way the
On the other hand, Microeconomics is the branchcountry designs its fiscal policy; this has been
of economics that concerns itself with thedone mainly by changing the composition of public
processes that firm's, households and individualsspending instead of expanding it.
concerns themselves in allocating limited resources.Thirdly, the countries central bank, the bank of
In this sense microeconomics scrutinizes howJapan has also followed Friedman’s rules in
these decisions affect the demand and supplyinflation targeting and interest rate benchmarking.
schedules and helps determine not only the pricesIn addition to these, the Japanese cabinet
but also how these prices influence the supply andespecially in recent years has been very vocal in
demand of goods and services in any giventrying to push for structural reforms as well as
market segment.the adoption of stringent business policies
Macroeconomics is generally divided in to twoespecially in the financial sector that has been
major areas of study; the business cycle whichaffected by banking crisis for a very long time.
concerns itself mainly with the consequences andConcerning the activities of the bank of Japan, it
causes of the of short term fluctuations inis important to note that for a long time now the
national income and the determinants of the longbank has been steadily increasing the money
run economic growth (increases in the nationalsupply. This is intended to contain inflation as well
income).as being a way of supporting the fiscal policy. In
As thus, the field of macroeconomics is ofaddition to this, the Japanese economy has been
paramount importance in designing, developing andunder a condition of a liquidity trap.
evaluating strategies and policies not only forAccording to the monetarist theory, mainly
governments but also for large corporations likeinfluenced by Milton Friedman, a country would
Sony and Toyota.most likely move out of a liquidity trap by turning
Macroeconomics concerns itself with economicto the printing press or increasing the money
aggregates of the nation’s economicsupply. In order for Japan to move out of the
activities. On this field, macroeconomics concernsliquidity trap, the bank of Japan has resulted to
itself with issues of government actions (spendingthe printing press as well as the purchase of
and taxation), issues of unemployment, inflation asJapanese government’s treasury bonds.
well as general economic policies.These are all monetarist activities and they go on
CONCERNING FRIEDMAN:to show us how the Japanese economy has gone
Friedman for a long time worked in isolation. Untilin line with the teachings of Milton Friedman.
the late 70s, many scholars especially in the fieldCRITICISMS:
of economics met Friedman’s work with aAlthough Friedman was very influential on the field
lot of hostility.of macroeconomics, very many different schools
Milton Friedman was an ardent opponent to theof thought have criticized, or have held different
Keynesian economics; Milton led the "Monetaristviews from those of Friedman. These include the
school" commonly referred to the Chicago SchoolMarxists, the Keynesians and neo-Keynesians.
against the Keynesian school of economics.The Keynesians and neo-Keynesians advocate for
Friedman's contributions include the "Permanenta mixed economy. In this view, they consider an
Income Hypothesis" on consumption (1957), inequally important role to be played by both the
addition to this there was the formulation ofprivate sector and the government. . Thus
risk-aversion and risk-proclivity (1948); he wasKeynes believed that the government was
also influential through his evolutionary theory onresponsible for not only helping the economy rise
the theory of the firm, including his ownout of a depression by increasing aggregate
propositions for a "positivist" methodology inspending but also it could increase general levels of
economics (1953).investments by pumping more money into the
Friedman was key influential in macroeconomicseconomy, then the citizens are encouraged to
especially in attacking the Keynesians on theirspend more because more money is in circulation.
view of the IS-LM analysis. In this attack,Once this is done then People will start to invest
Friedman wanted the Keynesians not to ignoremore, and the economy will react by increasing
money matters in their analysis.productive ventures.
He was critical in pinpointing the importance of aThus, Keynes argued that government
laissez-faire economy, but he still held theinvestment in public goods that will not be
proposition that concrete policies need to beprovided for by the market would encourage the
operational within the economy for there to beprivate sector's growth. This would include
harmony in the economy.government spending on such things as basic
In essence, the works and teachings of Friedmanresearch, public health, education, and
came to be an influential part of moderninfrastructure.
economics especially after the Keynesian analysisOn the other side, the Marxists beliefs in a social
failed to offer a solution to the 1970s crisisstate where neither the government nor the
because of the prevalent cost-push inflation andmarket takes control. Karl Marx believed that the
the inability of Keynesians to offer a solution tostate was a manifestation of the ruling class, in
the increasing wages and prices.many instances he claimed, that the ruling class
Friedman scathingly attacked the Keynesians forwas the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of
failing to debate or offer directions on the needproduction). Whose aim was self-enrichment under
for competitive markets, this Friedman said wassuch a state developments of either the
the reason why there had emerged largerinfrastructure or education would be done if it
monopolies within the 50s and the 60s which ledwere to their benefit and not to the benefit of
to the ensuing stagflation.the workers (Proletariat).
In addition to this, Friedman together with otherCONCLUSION:
scholars from the Chicago school providedThe works of Milton Friedman will continue to hold
evidence to prove that within competitivethe field of economics for a long time to come,
markets the price system could effectively andespecially in these days of globalization and
efficiently to allocate scarce resources. In his ownincreasing interdependence of states.
words, Friedman claimed that the price systemREFERENCES:
plays the following roles: firstly, the price systemHadjimichalakis M. (1982) Modern Economics,
provides incentives for the adoption of the leastPrentice Hall Publishers, New Jersey
costly methods of production. The price systemH. Stratton (1999) Economics: A New Introduction,
also helps in using available resources for the bestPluto Press, USA
use available, in addition the price system is usedMartin U. (1976) Agricultural Production Economics
to transmit information on production, availableand Resources Used, Oxford University Press,
resources and tastes, on top of this the pricesOxford
can be used to determine the distribution systemPaul Anthony Samuelson (1964) Economics,
“who gets what when and how”.McGraw-Hill publishers, USA
Friedman was also influential in designing testThomas A.