Fixing an NLRA Flaw

Throughout the essay, I will discuss the aspectscreate a hostile and adversarial relationship
of the law (NLRA) that I find most troublesome,whereas an employer (e.g., Wal-Mart) intent on
and why. In addition, I will endeavor to propose,resisting workers' self-organization can drag out
given the opportunity, what I would do to correctlegal proceedings for years, fearing little more
the problems and what effect do I think mythan an order to post a written notice in the
solution might have.workplace promising not to repeat unlawful
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), alsoconduct.
known as the Wagner Act, is a United StatesFor a solution (as Dr. Erik Peterson eloquently
labor law passed in 1935. It protects workers'argued), we don't need to look any further than
rights to organize and makes it illegal (via thecard check agreements - build trust between
enforcement of the NLRB) for employers tounion and employer and avoid expending public
interfere with that right.and private resources on unnecessary election
Like Marxism (Communism), NLRA looks better incampaigns. Similarly, the 2000 Human Rights
theory than in practice. For worse, the NLRA wasWatch Report recommended that Public policy
handicapped by the Taft-Hartley Act, passed inshould encourage the use of voluntary card-check
1947, which seek to reverse the gains achievedagreements as an alternative means of
by the unions via the NLRA.establishing workers' majority sentiment and
If I should be given the opportunity, I wouldcollective bargaining rights.
abolish the Taft-Hartley Act (otherwise, known asSpeaking of Public policy, the Employee Free
the slave labor law), especially due to its creationChoice Act (EFCA) that is currently making its
of a division in the NLRB so that the people (theway through Congress would be a remedy to the
General Counsel) prosecuting unfair labor practicessetback suffered by the decision made in the
were not the same people (the Board) makingcase: Dana Corp.; Metaldyne Corp. 351 NLRB No.
the final determination. (Please see my answer to28 (2007). (Please see my earlier essay for
the Short Answer question 3 for furtherfurther explanation). According to
discussion.) Thus, the NLRA would once moreThis new law would allow, or perhaps require,
become 'a level playing field.'recognition of unions by a company that is
Bear in mind, the NLRA, as amended, in itspresented with a sufficient number of "voluntarily"
present form is similar to an apple with manysigned union authorization cards. Other
worm holes (pun on loop holes). I could write acontroversial provisions of the law would require
thesis on the many problems of the NLRA andcompanies and unions that cannot reach a first
offer solutions but I am limited by the scope ofcontract to submit their dispute to mandatory
this paper.binding arbitration.
The next problem of the NLRA pertains to theIn conclusion, I discussed the aspects of the law
NLRB elections. (Please see my Essay # 1 for(NLRA) that I find most troublesome, and why. In
further elaboration.) NLRB elections provide certainaddition, I endeavored to propose, given the
protective features - the privacy of the votingopportunity, what I would do to correct the
booth; the secret ballot, and governmentalproblems and what effect do I think my solution
oversight. On the other hand, its campaign canmight have.