Doing Real Estate Deals With No Money Using Subject To Financing

This article is the first in a series of seventeenfor resale or rent it. In many cases the investor
articles that will give people insight into how realmay have re-sold the property to another buyer
estate investors are able to buy and sell realand allowed the original seller's mortgage to stay
estate with little or no money, no credit and littlein place.
or no risk. While it may seem impossible, tens ofViolating the due on sale clause is a violation of
thousands of these transactions are done weeklycontractual law which would have to play out in
throughout the country. Most home buyers arethe courts, versus criminal law which could result
familiar with buying a home using the traditionalin stiff fines or penalties. Because of this, there is
method of shopping with a realtor, finding a homeno Due on Sale Jail. In probably over 20,000+
and getting a mortgage to pay for it. Whilesubject to investor purchases there has never
traditional, this method is in no way related to thebeen any enforcement of the clause by lenders
huge leverage afforded investors doing deals withas long as the mortgage payments are being
creative financing.made. This could change and certain states are
The first and likely the most common method oftrying or may have passed legislation to make
an investor buying and holding a property forsubject to purchases illegal. Always check with an
more than a few days, is to do what is calledattorney familiar with real estate law before you
"subject to" purchase. This method allows thetry a subject to.
investor to purchase the property from the sellerThe benefit to the seller of a subject to is the
by keeping whatever existing mortgage that is inimmediate sale of his property to an investor. The
place at the time. The investor simply takes overinvestor doesn't have to worry about bad credit
the seller's mortgage payments from the date ofor no major down payment, if any at all. The
the closing forward.investor's market risk is limited to whatever
Over 30 years ago, lenders decided that theyequity he puts into the property at the original
could make more money on refinancing homeclosing and afterward in upgrades or repairs.
mortgages than allowing a new buyer to simplyHowever, the risk to the homeowner/seller is
assume their existing mortgage on the property.that the investor buyer, or the investor's buyer,
Since the average homeowner only lives in hiswill stop making mortgage payments and the
property for 5½ years, the reissuing of newlender will foreclose against the seller/homeowner.
mortgages became a primary source of revenueEven worse, is when a buyer makes late
for lenders. The lenders ability to later bundle andmortgage payments that will negatively impact
resell these loans lead to an acceleration ofthe homeowner/borrower's credit. Even if the
lenders making loans and a huge profit stream.borrower calls the lender and snitches on the
To overcome the assumption clauses that wereinvestor, the lender can only foreclose if the
common in their early mortgages, lenders insertedpayments aren't being made or they invoke their
what was called a "due on sale" clause. This clauserights on the due on sale clause - which they
basically stated that if a borrower (mortgagor)seldom do. The homeowner is left to suffer until
sold, transferred or exchanged the encumberedthe mortgage is paid off at another sale by the
property, the mortgage was due and payable. Ifinvestor or until the lender forecloses. The late
the borrower didn't pay off the mortgage at thepayments or foreclosure of the loan do not
sale or transfer, the mortgage was immediatelyaffect the credit of the investor because he is
subject to a foreclosure proceeding by the lender.not the borrower.
In actuality, as long as the lenders received theIn summary, investors have a powerful tool in
mortgage payments, they never pushed the issueusing subject to financing to acquire a property.
of the transgression by the homeownerCommon sense and prudence should be exercised
borrower selling the property. The investors whoso the seller is not exposed to potential credit
do "subject to" transactions were able to controldamaging results of the sale. The benefit to the
the properties with little or no money because ofhomeowner/seller can be immense as the relief
the financing in place, no credit qualifications by theof getting rid of a mortgage payment and the
lender and no market risk unless they had putresponsibilities of the property's maintenance in
money into the deal for the seller to leave.minutes. So, subject to financing can be a win-win
The investor could simply get a warranty orfor all parties involved if the risks are properly
quitclaim deed from the seller and file it at thedisclosed to the homeowner and appropriate
local courthouse, continue making the mortgagedocumentation is signed by both parties to
payments and move into the property, rehab itprotect their interests.