| Cyber jurisprudence, a developing concept | | | | under its provisions. If however, the piece of |
| By | | | | “Virtual Land” is considered a “unit of |
| S J TUBRAZY | | | | property” created out of the contractual |
| | | | | agreement between the player and the gaming |
| The Latin words jus and prudentia being mutated | | | | company as well as one player with another |
| as jurisprudence in English has been defined as | | | | player, while it enables application of the concepts |
| “knowledge of law or knowledge of just and | | | | of “Contract Laws”, it conflicts with the |
| unjust. Etymologically, no doubt this definition | | | | basic requirement of “Meeting of the |
| conforms to the word but it brings within its | | | | Minds” in contracts. The reason is that in this |
| compass every branch of law. | | | | case, the parties dealt with the “unit of |
| | | | | property” as an “Immovable |
| In Bragg vs. linden court hold that ‘although | | | | Property” and not as any thing else. If the |
| the facts of the case are virtual but the dispute is | | | | buyer and the seller thought and acted as if thy |
| real’. | | | | were buying and selling a piece of land, it would be |
| | | | | in appropriate to adjudicate on the dispute ignoring |
| It is clear however that the virtual acquisitions had | | | | this basic thought behind the transaction and |
| the requisites of a “Property” since they | | | | considering it as some thing else. |
| had a value, could be owned, transferred or | | | | |
| otherwise dealt with. If the value of the property | | | | Legal issues relating to the electronic and internet |
| was entirely in the virtual currency such as | | | | in this contemporary world as being necessitated |
| “lindens’, then the dispute would have | | | | of new kind of jurisprudence, which may be |
| been entirely in the virtual space and fit for a | | | | cyber jurisprudence. Cyber jurisprudence gives an |
| “Virtual Court” to decide. But in the | | | | analysis of the law where, is no land and even |
| instance case, the convertibility of lindens to | | | | there is no border, where all things may be |
| dollars creates a distinct link to the physical world | | | | different from the physical world, they may be |
| and hence the dispute spills over to the physical | | | | virtual from origin and nature. We may find virtual |
| space. | | | | world with virtual rules and policies, along with the |
| | | | | virtual subject matter, virtual contract, virtual |
| Analogous troubles will arise in the future in | | | | disputes, virtual property (including tangible or |
| several other transactions on the virtual space | | | | intangible), virtual possession and virtual court. |
| and we should keep ourselves mentally prepared | | | | Cyber jurisprudence deals with the composite idea |
| for accepting new concepts of virtual property | | | | of cyber jurisdiction and cyber court’s venue |
| and laws relating to virtual property. The initial | | | | in the cyberspace. It emphasis to recognize cyber |
| attempt is of course to extend the known | | | | uniform rules and policies at international level, it |
| physical society concepts to the virtual space | | | | also discusses with the netizens and netiquates. |
| while in due course we need to develop separate | | | | |
| Cyber Jurisprudence to deal with such disputes. | | | | |
| If the Bragg’s case is to be decided in | | | | The modern jurists have to had getting heads |
| Pakistan according to physical laws, the nature of | | | | together to endow with the rationale pedestal of |
| the property being “Land”, the transfer | | | | jurisprudence to this ruling, now we can ascertain |
| should be subject to “Transfer of Property | | | | utmost exact definition of cyber jurisprudence as |
| Act” and “Registration Act”. Transfer | | | | “this describes the principles of legal issues, |
| of Property Act does not however recognize | | | | which exclusively regulates the cyberspace and |
| “virtual land” as an immovable property | | | | internet”. |
| and therefore the transaction would not be valid | | | | |