Are Your Part-Time Staff Entitled To Time Off In Lieu Of Bank Holidays?

This month we look at a difficult area foremployee's working days, how should the
employers - what bank holidays are youremployer make up the additional day(s)? The DTI
part-time employees entitled to? With two bankGuidance on part-time working suggests that it
holidays in May, the Employment Appeal Tribunal'smay be necessary to remove the disadvantage
recent decision in McMenemy v Capita Businesssuffered by those staff who do not receive
Services Limited will be of interest to employersparticular days off as a result of their particular
of part-time staff.working pattern, for example, by giving all
Four of the eight bank holidays always fall on aworkers a pro rata entitlement to days off in lieu
Monday (Easter Monday, May Day, Spring Bankaccording to the number of hours they work. In
Holiday and August Bank Holiday). One is alwaysour example above, this would mean giving the
on a Friday (Good Friday) and the other threeemployee at least one additional day off in lieu of
vary from year to year. There has been debatebank holidays.
for some time about whether part timeThe difficulty with such a system is that it is
employees are eligible for pro-rata time off in lieucomplicated to administer and can have an
of bank holidays where they do not work on aadverse effect on part-time employees who do
Monday. The basis for this argument is thework on Mondays. If the part-time employee
Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Lessworked on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, at
Favorable) Treatment Regulations 2000 thatleast five bank holidays would fall on working days
make it unlawful to treat a worker less favorably(all the Monday bank holidays and Good Friday). If
on grounds of his or her part-time status.Christmas Day and New Year's Day also fell on a
In this case, Mr. McMenemy worked three days aMonday, seven bank holidays would fall on
week (Wednesday, Thursday and Friday). Heworking days. Under the pro-rata system
claimed that he was being treated less favourablysuggested by the DTI, the employee would only
than full-time employees, as he did not get thebe entitled to five days of bank holidays. What
benefit of bank holidays that fell on a Monday.should the employer do about the other two bank
Under his contract of employment, he washolidays for which they would have been paid?
entitled to take paid leave on public holidaysThere are two options. Either the employee would
where they fell on one of his normal workingbe required to use some contractual holiday
days. His employer's business operated 7 days aentitlement to cover those days or alternatively
week. This meant that some full-time employeesbe given the option of coming to work on a day
also did not work on Mondays. In fact, Mr.they did not normally work. Neither of these
McMenemy's line manager had worked a Tuesdayoptions would be favored by employers or
to Saturday shift for some time. During thispart-time employees, as they are difficult to
period, he did not get time off in lieu of bankadminister and would not fit in with part time
holidays that fell on a Monday. The Employmentworking arrangements.
Appeal Tribunal held that the reason that Mr.Many employers therefore simply give their
McMenemy did not get time off in lieu of bankpart-time staff the benefit of bank holidays if
holidays that fell on a Monday was not becausethey fall on one of their normal working days. This
he was part-time as full-time employees weresystem clearly does not always give part-time
treated in the same way. Rather, it was becausestaff the same benefits as full-time staff on a
he did not work on a Monday. Mr. McMenemypro-rata basis. As such, it is unlawful discrimination,
therefore lost his claim.unless an employer can justify it. There is an
This case is likely to be helpful to manyargument that an employer could justify this
employers in the retail, leisure and manufacturingsystem of restricting the benefit of time off for
sectors that operate on a 7-day week basis.bank holidays to staff who actually work on those
However, where does it leave employers whodays on the basis that the time off relates to the
operate 5 days a week from Monday to Friday?days worked rather than the part-time status.
What are the options for employers who operateHowever, this argument is untested.
5 days a week?This issue may be resolved in the not too distant
Where an employer operates on a 5-day weekfuture as the Government proposed in its 2005
basis (Monday to Friday), all full time employeeselection manifesto that during their third term
will receive the benefit of bank holidays that fallthey would extend the entitlement to paid annual
on a Monday (assuming that their contracts ofleave to include bank holidays. The Government
employment provide for this). A part-timehas included an enabling power in the Work and
employee who does not work on Mondays willFamilies Bill. This is subject to further consultation
benefit from a maximum of only four bankand is not expected to come into force until 2007
holidays a year (depending on what dayat the earliest. What is worth noting however is
Christmas falls).that the DTI make clear in their Guidance that if
The Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Lessbank holidays are treated as additional leave on
Favorable Treatment) Regulations 2000 providetop of the statutory four weeks, the amount of
that part-time workers should have the sametime allocated to part-time staff will be calculated
benefits as full-time workers on a pro rata basis.on a pro-rata basis.
A full-time employee will get 8 days off for bankThere is no easy solution to this issue. Employers
holidays. Therefore, a part-time employee whoneed to consider their working arrangements
works say 3 days a week should get 5 days offcarefully. If you would like further advice on this,
in respect of bank holidays. As a maximum ofplease contact one of the employment team.
only four bank holidays fall on the part-time